| Score | 91 |
|---|---|
| Trainee Name | Bernadette Milan |
| Trainee Email | bernadettemilanyoga@gmail.com |
| Select Case Study | JWS |
| Criteria Score Sheet | |
| Scope - Key concepts and goals identified; appropriately applied to client/group | 5 Exceptional Response is focused and compelling. Details are richly presented in a purposeful and concise way. |
| Feedback on Scope | |
| Comprehension of Core Concepts - Demonstrates a clear understanding of concepts from modules with the integration of critical thinking skills in goal and implementation. | 4 Proficient The response identified relationships between concepts, there is some breadth of information, and minor adjustments may be needed |
| Feedback on Comprehension of Core Concepts | Client Goals: Even though the diagnosys changed and the SI and pain was addressed mainly by working on the asymmetricity, was this goal of strengthening followed? |
| Analysis of Key Issues - Shows consideration of specific client/group, IY, and Yoga Therapy. | 4 Proficient Response is well reasoned, logically sequenced, and rational. Although knowledge is demonstrated, the response may not be fully convincing |
| Analysis of Key Issues Feedback | SI joint stability could have been addressed in more depth. |
| Application--IYTh teachings and client goals are clearly and appropriately addressed in plan and follow up. | 4 Proficient The response shows evidence of the ability to apply skills; the response is mostly complete but may have some gaps |
| Application of Key Teaching Feedback | Viparita Karina (Karani)? There are 2 different practices that are nowadays using this name. Classically this is a mudra and has nothing to do with restorative application as we teach the legs up the wall which is not a mudra. This is a modernized way of using a Sanskrit name for something that was very different practice and purpose classically. Please explore. |
| Relevance and Accuracy - Justifies methods and application. | 5 Exceptional Points / assertions are supported by relevant research and references. |
| Relevance and Accuracy Feedback | |
| Integration and Originality - Exhibits critical thinking and individualized approach to client/group. Shows a difference between Yoga Teacher and Yoga Therapist approach. | 5 Exceptional Demonstrates critical thinking about the topic and own interpretations. The reasoning is not merely presented but interpreted and applied to core concept. |
| Integration and Originality Feedback | |
| Observations, Recommendations, Alternative Solutions - Reveals significant reflection and understanding of population and Yoga therapy. Displays ability to adapt, adjust, accommodate. | 5 Exceptional Well-reasoned, logical, relevant observations and recommendations on effective solutions to most of the problems/issues. Alternatives are discussed and cover all areas of evaluation. |
| Observations, Recommendations, Alternative Solutions Feedback | |
| Writing Skills and Professional Presentation - Case Study is presented in professional manner. | 5 Exceptional Writing is totally free of grammar and spelling errors. Clear, concise, and creative presentation of ideas and properly referenced. |
| Writing Skills and Professional Presentation Feedback |
Admin – Case Study Rubrics
