Scope - Key teaching and goal identified; appropriately applied to client/group throughout TCA
5 Exceptional Response is focused and compelling. Details are richly presented in a purposeful and concise way.
4 Proficient Clearly presented and purposeful response; details could be enriched and more compelling
3 Basic Clear response that may lack supporting details; may contain unnecessary distracting, and/or superfluous content.
2 Limited Response is somewhat clear. Some information does not support the central theme, is limited, and/or inconsequential.
0 Not Demonstrated Topic is not answered, or response is unclear and/or without purpose. And/or the response has been plagiarized.
Feedback on Scope
The key teaching using the combination of the sutra and the witness/awareness practice for this client seems well thought out and seems to fit.
Comprehension of Core Concepts - Demonstrates a clear understanding of concepts from the training and IY with the integration of critical thinking skills in goal and implementation.
5 Exceptional The response is complex, accurate, comprehensive, & showing breadth and depth of information; relationships are described and conclusions drawn.
4 Proficient The response identified relationships between concepts, there is some breadth of information, and minor adjustments may be needed
3 Basic The response presents some accurate information about the concepts, but the response is incomplete and there are some inaccuracies.
2 Limited The response addresses the assigned task but provides no accurate information about the concepts.
0 Not Demonstrated The response does not address the assigned task.
Feedback on Comprehension of Core Concepts
the goal is SMART and you can always add more. Your intuition guides you to what is best for each client and this seems pretty specific, measurable when you meet again to discuss the flare ups, mostly seems doable and extremely relevant to this client.
Analysis of Key Issues - Shows consideration of specific client/group, IY, core training, and Yoga Therapy.
5 Exceptional The analysis is well reasoned, logical sequence and rational; Thoughtful and convincing response clearly demonstrates depth of topic knowledge
4 Proficient Response is well reasoned, logically sequenced, and rational. Although knowledge is demonstrated, the response may not be fully convincing
3 Basic Response is mostly reasoned, logically sequenced, and rational. Depth of analysis and/or organization and/or topic knowledge may be lacking.
2 Limited Response is unconvincing and/or disorganized; Response demonstrates an insufficient analysis and/or topic knowledge is not demonstrated.
0 Not Demonstrated Analysis is not attempted, or the response fails to demonstrate effort or address the central topic.
Analysis of Key Issues Feedback
The simple sutra and witness practice for this module allow you to go deeper - exploring PB and some pranayama practices to support your key teaching and your goal, well thought out and integrated, creating a therapeutic relationship with this client based on trust
Application Key teaching and goal are clearly and appropriately addressed in plan and follow up.
5 Exceptional The response shows evidence of the ability to apply skills; the response is complete and shows proficiency in the skill.
4 Proficient The response shows evidence of the ability to apply skills; the response is mostly complete but may have some gaps
3 Basic The response shows some evidence of the ability to apply skills. The response may have inaccuracies or be incomplete.
2 Limited The response shows little evidence of the ability to apply skills.
0 Not Demonstrated The response shows no ability to apply skills.
Application of Key Teaching Feedback
Good plan and reasonably well executed, follow up also includes the homework - how much per day etc and may need to find a way to ground yourself prior to meeting with her and to teach her to do the same and maybe introduction of a mantra at some point to help fix the mind on a point vs scattered.
Relevance and Accuracy - Justifies methods and application.
5 Exceptional Points / assertions are supported by relevant research and references.
4 Proficient Supporting points are made but research with greater relevance could be integrated
3 Basic Supporting evidence is not relevant, recent or from questionable sources.
2 Limited Lacks necessary support for points.
0 Not Demonstrated No references to support points made.
Relevance and Accuracy Feedback
Use of the sutras for this report can be considered your evidence or support of your key teaching. 1:3 seer, 2:33 PB (There's no book/pada 5-could be a typo)
Integration and Originality - Exhibits critical thinking and individualized approach to TCA. Shows a difference between Yoga Teacher and Yoga Therapist approach.
5 Exceptional Demonstrates critical thinking about the topic and own interpretations. The reasoning is not merely presented but interpreted and applied to core concept.
4 Proficient Demonstrates critical thinking about the topic and own interpretations. The reasoning is presented but could be better interpreted and applied to core concept.
3 Basic Lacks some critical thinking about the topic and own interpretations. The reasoning may not be presented and could be better interpreted and applied to the core concept
2 Limited Lack critical thinking about the topic and the interpretations. The reasoning is not interpreted or applied to core concept.
0 Not Demonstrated No critical thinking about the topic and the interpretations. The reasoning is not interpreted or applied to core concept.
Integration and Originality Feedback
A unique practice tailor made for this woman, may need some tweaking if you continue to work with her to keep her attention
Observations, Recommendations, Alternative Solutions - Reveals significant reflection and understanding of population and key teaching. Displays ability to adapt, adjust, accommodate.
5 Exceptional Well-reasoned, logical, relevant observations and recommendations on effective solutions to most of the problems/issues. Alternatives are discussed and cover all areas of evaluation.
4 Proficient Solid, well-thought out observations and recommendations on effective solutions to many of the problems/issues. Alternatives are discussed with some methods to evaluate.
3 Basic Shallow observations and recommendations on effective solutions to some of the problems/issues. Alternatives are mentioned with a method to evaluate.
2 Limited Superficial observations and recommendations on effective solutions to a few of the problems/issues. One alternative is mentioned with an evaluation method.
0 Not Demonstrated No alternatives are given and/or no evaluation method given.
Observations, Recommendations, Alternative Solutions Feedback
Great to see that when the client was a little of kilter, ungrounded and not focused, you found yourself feeling the same. It's hard to protect yourself, but have to create a space around you as you enter, imagine any unwanted energy bouncing right off and away from you allowing you to stay grounded. Might need to do a little work yourself with pranayama included before you step into this space with the client.
Writing Skills and Professional Presentation - TCA is presented in professional manner.
5 Exceptional Writing is totally free of grammar and spelling errors. Clear, concise, and creative presentation of ideas and properly referenced.
4 Proficient Competent There are few spelling or grammatical errors. Most ideas are clearly presented, and references are used.
3 Basic There are spelling or grammatical errors. Some ideas are clearly presented. References are sporadic or not used.
2 Limited There are many spelling errors and grammatical mistakes. Ideas are hard to follow. References are not used.
0 Not Demonstrated The paper is illegible and incomprehensible.
Writing Skills and Professional Presentation Feedback
clearly presented - typos of sutras otherwise exceptional 🙂
